Thursday, April 7, 2022

CRIMINAL LITIGATION ATP 101 REVISION (ANSWERS) (PAST PAPERS) - Common drafting samples/Judicial Review/Chamber Summons/Notice of Motion/Petition of Appeal/Charge Sheet/

 

QUESTION 1 JUDICIAL REVIEW

 

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

MISC. CAUSE  NO. … OF 2013

 

IN THE MATTER OF: THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA ARTICLE 23(3)(F) AND

IN THE MATTER OF: THE LAW REFOREM ACT CHAPTER 26

                                  LAWS OF KENYA SECTIONS 8 AND 9

 

IN THE MATTER OF: AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR

                                  JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDERS OF CERTIORARI

                                  AND PROHIBITION

 

BETWEEN

AKINYI MWANGALE...............…………………………….………….  APPLICANT

 

AND

INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE………………....………………..RESPONDENT[S1] 

 

 

CHAMBERS SUMMONS

(Under Order LIII Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules, Sections 8 and 9 of the Law Reform Act Cap 26 Laws of Kenya and all other enabling provisions of the law)

 

LET ALL PARTIES CONCERNED attend the Honourable Judge in Chambers on the             day of                            20.. at 9 O’clock in the forenoon or soon thereafter as counsel for the Applicants may be heard on an Application for ORDERS THAT:-

1.    This Application be certified as urgent.

2.    Leave do issue to the Applicant to apply for:-

 

a.    AN ORDER OF CERTIORARI to remove into this Honourable Court and quash the Memorandum issued by the Respondent and dated 23 August 2013.[S2] 

 

b.    AN ORDER OF PROHIBITION directed at the Respondent restraining the Respondent and officers subordinate to him from implementing the Memorandum dated 23 August 2013.

[S3] 

c.     AN ORDER OF PROHIBITION directed at the Respondent prohibiting the Respondent and officers subordinate to him from discriminating and profiling members of the Alawuon ethnic group.

 

 

3.    The leave so granted does operate as stay of the enforcement of the implementation of the Respondent’s memorandum dated 23 August 2013.[S4] 

 

WHICH APPLICATION is based on the following grounds:-

 

a)    .

 

AND is further grounded on the grounds set out in the statement annexed hereto and the verifying Affidavits of ……. and on further grounds to be adduced at the hearing hereof.

 

DATED at Nairobi this               day of                                              20...

 

 

 

[S5] …….

ADVOCATES FOR THE APPLICANT

 

 

 

DRAWN & FILED BY:-

XXXXXX

NAIROBI

 

 

 

IT IS INTENDED TO BE SERVED THE NOTICE OF MOTION SUBSEQUENT TO THIS APPLICATION UPON:

The Attorney General

Sheria House

NAIROBI


REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

MISC. CAUSE  NO. … OF 2013

 

IN THE MATTER OF: THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA ARTICLE 23(3)(F) AND

IN THE MATTER OF: THE LAW REFOREM ACT CHAPTER 26

                                  LAWS OF KENYA SECTIONS 8 AND 9

 

IN THE MATTER OF: AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR

                                  JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDERS OF CERTIORARI

                                  AND PROHIBITION

 

BETWEEN

AKINYI MWANGALE...............…………………………….………….  APPLICANT

 

AND

INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE………………....………………..RESPONDENT

 

STATEMENT

(Under order LIII rule 1(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules and all enabling provisions of the law)

 

A.   NAME AND DESCRIPTION OF THE APPLICANT

1.    THE NAME OF THE APPLICANT IS (NAME AND DESCRIBE THE APPLICANT…THE APPLICANT’S ADDRESS IS…)[S6] 

 

B.   RELIEFS SOUGHT

 

THE APPLICANT SEEKS:-

 

a.    AN ORDER OF CERTIORARI to remove into this Honourable Court and quash the Memorandum issued by the Respondent and dated 23 August 2013.[S7] 

 

b.    AN ORDER OF PROHIBITION directed at the Respondent restraining the Respondent and officers subordinate to him from implementing the Memorandum dated 23 August 2013.

[S8] 

c.     AN ORDER OF PROHIBITION directed at the Respondent prohibiting the Respondent and officers subordinate to him from discriminating and profiling members of the Alawuon ethnic group.

 

 

C.       THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH THE RELIEF(S) IS/ARE SOUGHT:-

         1. SPECIFY THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH THE APPLICATION IS BASED[S9] 

 

DATED AT NAIROBI THIS …..DAY OF ……20...

 

SIGNED

ADVOCATES FOR THE APPLICANTS

 

DRAWN & FILED BY:-

xxxxxx

NAIROBI

 

 

 

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

MISC. APPLICATION NO. … OF 2009

IN THE MATTER OF: THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA ARTICLE 23(3)(F) AND

IN THE MATTER OF: THE LAW REFOREM ACT CHAPTER 26

                                  LAWS OF KENYA SECTIONS 8 AND 9

 

 

AND

REPUBLIC …………………………………………………………….. APPLICANT

 

-VERSUS-

 

THE INSPECTOR  GENERAL OF POLICE…………….……………. RESPONDENT

 

 

EX PARTE:

 

AKINYI MWANGALE[S10] 

..............

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

(Under Order LIII Rules 3 and 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Sections 8 and 9 of the Law Reform Act, Cap 26 Laws of Kenya and all enabling provisions of the Laws)[S11] 

 

TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to leave granted by this Honourable Court on the … day of July 20.., the Honourable Court shall be moved on the                  day of                            20.. at 9.00 O’clock in the forenoon or soon thereafter as counsel for the ex parte applicants may be heard on an application for ORDERS THAT:-

  1. The Honourable Court be pleased to grant:-
    1. AN ORDER OF CERTIORARI to remove into this Honourable Court and quash the Memorandum issued by the Respondent and dated 23 August 2013.[S12] 

 

    1. AN ORDER OF PROHIBITION directed at the Respondent restraining the Respondent and officers subordinate to him from implementing the Memorandum dated 23 August 2013.

[S13] 

    1. AN ORDER OF PROHIBITION directed at the Respondent prohibiting the Respondent and officers subordinate to him from discriminating and profiling members of the Alawuon ethnic group.[S14] 

 

  1. The costs of this application be provided for.

 

WHICH APPLICATION is grounded on the grounds set out in the statement already filed and the verifying Affidavits of …….. and… on further grounds to be adduced at the hearing hereof.

 

DATED at Nairobi this               day of                                              20..

 

 

 

……..

ADVOCATES FOR THE EX PARTE APPLICANTS

 

 

 

DRAWN & FILED BY:-

XXXXXXX

NAIROBI

 

 

TO BE SERVED UPON:-

1.    The Attorney General

Sheria House

NAIROBI

 

2.    The Chief Magistrate’s Court

NAIROBI

 

3.    XXXXXXX

NAIROBI

 

 

 

QUESTION 2 HABEAS CORPUS

 

 

A)

IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

MISC. CAUSE NO….OF 2013

 

ABENGA BIIRA………………….……………………..APPLICANT

AND

INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE……………..RESPONDENT

 

CERTIFICATE OF URGENCY[S15] 

 

I….an advocate of the High Court of Kenya do certify that this matter is of utmost urgency as the Respondent has taken the applicant into custody and continues to unlawfully detain the said applicant in custody in breach of the applicant’s constitutional rights.[S16] 

 

 

DATED at Nairobi this               day of                                              20...

 

 

 

…….

ADVOCATES FOR THE APPLICANT

 

 

 

DRAWN & FILED BY:-

XXXXXX

NAIROBI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

MISC. CAUSE NO….OF 2013

 

ABENGA BIIRA……………………………………..APPLICANT

AND

INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE……………..RESPONDENT[S17] 

 

CHAMBER SUMMONS

(Under Article 25(d) and 51(d) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, Section 389 of the Criminal Procedure Rules and Rules 2 and 3 of The Rules in the Nature of Directions of Habeas Corpus)

[S18] 

 

LET ALL PARTIES CONCERNED attend the Honourable Judge in Chambers on the             day of                            20.. at 9 O’clock in the forenoon or soon thereafter as counsel for the Applicants may be heard on an Application for ORDERS THAT:-

1.    This Application be certified as urgent.

2.    An order that Directions in the nature of Habeas Corpus do issue directed to the Respondent or his agents and or representative to have the body of Abenga Biira produced before the honorable court at such time as the judge may direct;[S19] 

3.    An order that the Respondent and or his agents or employees do appear in person or by his duly authorised agent together with the original of any warrant or order of detention to show cause why the said Abenga Biira should not be released forthwith.[S20] 

4.    Pending the hearing of this summons inter partes, the Respondent directed to release the applicant on bail on such terms and conditions as the court deems fit to grant.[S21] 

5.    That the court do declare that the applicant’s rights under the constitution have been or are about to be infringed;

6.    Costs of this application be provided for.

WHICH APPLICATION is based on the following grounds:-

 

a)    The applicant was taken into custody by the Respondent’s officers on the 28 September 2013;

b)    The applicant has since not been taken before a court of law;

c)    He has been in the Respondent’s custody for the last 2 months;

d)    The Respondent has no lawful reason to continue detaining the applicant in custody;

e)    the continued detention of the applicant in the custody of the Respondent is injurious to the constitutional rights of the applicant.[S22] 

 

AND is further grounded on the affidavits of Jill Biira, Brenda Ndugutse and on further grounds to be adduced at the hearing hereof.

 

DATED at Nairobi this               day of                                              20...

 

 

 

[S23] …….

ADVOCATES FOR THE APPLICANT

 

 

 

DRAWN & FILED BY:-

XXXXXX

NAIROBI

 

 

 

 

IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

MISC. CAUSE NO….OF 2013

 

ABENGA BIIRA………………………………………..APPLICANT

AND

INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE……………..RESPONDENT

                                                                 

                                                      SUPPORTING AFFIDAVIT

I Jill Abenga a resident of Rongai and of Post Office Box Number….Kajiado in the Republic of Kenya do hereby solemnly and sincerely make oath and state as follows:

 

1.     THAT I am a female adult of sound mind and disposition hence competent to make and swear this affidavit.

2.     THAT I am the wife to the applicant/subject herein hence.

3.     THAT I live with the applicant in Rongai township of Kajiado County.

4.     THAT the applicant was taken into custody by the Respondent’s officers on the 28 September 2013 at our matrimonial home in Rongai township of Kajiado County.

5.    THAT the applicant has since not been taken before a court of law for the last two months.

6.    THAT I am advised by the applicant’s advocates on record which advise I verily believe to be true that the Respondent has no lawful reason of detaining the applicant.

7.    THAT I am advised by the applicant’s advocates on record which advise I verily believe to be true that the continued detention of the applicant in the custody of the Respondent is injurious to the constitutional rights of the applicant.[MSOffice24] 

8.     THAT  all that is deponed to herein is true to the best of my knowledge save for matters deponed to on information and belief sources and grounds whereof have been disclosed.

 

SWORN at Nairobi

this….day of…..November 2013

 

 

BEFORE ME

 

 

COMMISSIONER FOR OATHS

 

 

 

B)

·       production Order is issued when a person is in lawful custody while the writ of habeas corpus is issued when person is in unlawful custody;

·       Production order is issued only in ongoing proceedings while Habeas corpus is not issued in relation to any other proceedings other than the application for the writ;

·       Production Order is issued by any court seized of proceedings for which the accused is in custody while the writ of habeas corpus is only issued on application by the High Court. [MSOffice25] 

 

 

 

QUESTION 3 : Taking Plea

 

The procedure is as set out in Aden v R [1973] E.A 445 (C.A) where the following guidelines were laid down:

1)    The charge and all the essential ingredients of the offence should be explained to the accused in his own language or in one that he understands;

2)    The accused’s own words should be recorded and if they are an admission a plea of guilty should be recorded;

3)    The prosecution should then immediately state the facts and the accused should be given an opportunity to dispute/explain facts or to add any relevant facts;

4)    If the accused does not agree with the facts or raise any question of his guilt, his reply must be recorded and change of plea entered;

5)    If there’s no change of plea, a conviction should be recorded and a statement of the facts relevant to sentence together with the accused‘s reply should be recorded;

In this instance, the accused’s plea was equivocal. The court did not enter a plea of guilty. The magistrate sentenced the appellant without convicting him. The right to appeal is a matter of right under law.[MSOffice26] 

 

b)

 

IN THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA

AT THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA IN NAIROBI

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. ….2013

 

HARAKA HARAMU…………….APPELLANT

VERSUS

REPUBLIC……………………….RESPONDENT

 

PETITION OF APPEAL

(Being an appeal against the conviction and sentence of Hon. Phionah Yassin (Ms.) CM in Criminal Case No. … of …, Republic versus Haraka Haramu delivered on 12November, 2013)

 

The Appellant, Haraka Haramu, hereby appeals against the conviction and sentence of the court in criminal case No. …. of …. on the following grounds:-

 

1.     The learned magistrate erred in law in recording a plea of guilt on an equivocal plea.

2.     The learned Magistrate erred in law in failing to enter a plea of guilt.

3.     The learned Magistrate erred in law in failing to convict the appellant.

4.     The learned Magistrate erred in law in failing to ask the prosecution to render facts of the charge.

5.     The learned Magistrate erred in law in failing to entertain the appellant on mitigation.

6.     The learned magistrate erred in law in sentencing the appellant under the wrong provisions of the law.

 

REASONS WHEREFORE the Appellant prays that the conviction and sentence be set aside.

 

DATED at Nairobi this 25th day of October, 2007.

 

 

xxxx & CO.

ADVOCATES FOR THE APPELLANT

 

 

Drawn & Filed By: -   

 

 

 

Q. 4

a)     The first part of (a) simply calls for identification of the three basic classifications or categories of bail, namely:-

               i.         Bail pending trial...½ Mark.

              ii.         Bail pending appeal...½ Mark.

            iii.         Anticipatory Bail (sometimes called bail pending arrest)...½ Mark.

The second part of (a) calls upon the candidate to dig a little deeper into his/her knowledge of the subject of bail and broadly say something about its guiding principles under the three identified classifications:-

               i.         Bail pending trial

Ø  Ordinarily applies to a person under arrest on suspicion of involvement in commission of a criminal offence. Bail entails a temporary release of a criminal suspect from custody to await trial.

Ø  Issue of the suspect’s temporary release pending trial may arise at a police station or in court.

Ø  If the issue arises at a police station, a police officer investigating the alleged offence may require the suspect to execute a bond in such sum & in such form as may be required, subject to the condition that the suspect shall duly attend court if required to do so: S. 53(1) National Police Service Act, No. 11A of 2011; also S. 123(1) CPC.

Ø  If the issue arises when the suspect has been taken to and accused before court, the court may give bail.

Ø  The suspect’s/accused’s executed bond or written promise to turn up in court for trial as a condition for his/her temporary release constitutes a recognisance and the term bail bond is frequently used: See Douglas Brown’s “Criminal Procedure in Uganda & Kenya” (p. 27).

Ø  The principal guidelines for the release of a criminal suspect on bond or bail pending trial are the constitutional presumption of innocence until the contrary is proved: Art. 50(2)(a); and the fact that bail is a constitutional right (not absolute), which obligates the prosecution to show compelling reasons for refusal of bail: Art. 49(1)(h).

Ø  The main consideration in bail pending trial is whether the accused will attend trial; here the presumption of innocence weighs heavily in favour of the grant of bail.

.........1½Marks.

              ii.         Bail pending appeal

Ø  Here the scenario changes drastically in that the presumption of innocence no longer applies. Instead the presumption is that when the applicant for bail was convicted, he/she was properly convicted. That is why where he/she is undergoing custodial sentence, he/she must demonstrate that there are exceptional circumstances or unusual circumstances to warrant his/her release on bail pending appeal: See e.g.  Somo –vs- R [1972] EA 476.

Ø  Other judicial precedents hold that the most fundamental ground for consideration of bail pending appeal is whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success: See e.g. Masran –vs- R [1960] EA 321.

.........1½Marks.

            iii.         Anticipatory Bail

Ø  Not specifically provided for by Kenyan law.

Ø  Jurisprudence is, however, now firmly settled that bail may be granted in anticipation of arrest for ulterior motives other than genuine pursuit of criminal justice: See W’Njuguna –vs- Republic [2004] 1 KLR 520.

Ø  It is to be noted that bail is one of the fundamental rights and freedoms under Kenya’s Constitutional Bill of Rights (Ch. 4). The jurisprudence alluded to above is in line with the Constitution which, for instance, provides that every person has the right to institute court proceedings claiming that a right or fundamental freedom in the Bill of Rights has been denied, violated or infringed, or is threatened: Art. 22(1).

.........1½Marks.

b)    The candidate with a good grasp of the principles of bail under the three classifications alluded to under part (a) is expected to detect from the practical scenario given in this part (b) that the principles to guide him/her in crafting a Ruling are the principles guiding considerations of applications for bail pending trial, apply them suitably and write an appropriate Ruling. As to how many of the 9 available marks the candidate earns depends on demonstration of-

               i.         Knowledge of the applicable bail principles;

              ii.         Appreciation that guidelines for writing a Ruling in a criminal matter are basically the same as those for writing a Judgment in a criminal matter given in S.169 CPC;

            iii.         Logical and cogent reasoning including use of relevant precedents in support of the position he/she takes regarding the given scenario. Demonstration of knowledge, for instance, of Republic –vs- Danson Mgunya & Another(High Court Criminal Appeal No. 26 of 2008) where bail pending trial in a murder case was granted and of Republic –vs- John Kahindi  Karisa & 2 Others (High Court Criminal Appeal No. 23 of 2010) where the same court denied bail pending trial in a murder case and the reasons for the different decisions would be an added advantage.

............9 Marks.

 

Q. 5

a)         Identification (ID) Parades are part of the process of investigation and detection of crime.  An ID          

Parade may be described simply as a line of persons including someone suspected/accused of involvement in the commission of a reported criminal offence.

 ..........1½ Marks.

b)         The purpose of an ID Parade is to give a witness claiming to have witnessed the commission of a reported crime an opportunity to pick the suspect (previously unknown to the witness) from the parade in order for the suspect to face the requisite criminal charge(s) for the alleged offence(s).

            ..................1½ Marks.

c)         The legal basis for ID Parades is broadly derived from the National Police Service Act, No.11A of 2011 which empowers the police to undertake investigation and detection of crime: See S.35(b) & (d). ID Parades are expressly provided for under the Police Standing Orders (Chapter 46 Standing Order 6) previously made under the Repealed Police Act S.5 and saved under the succeeding National Police Service Act: See S.131.

            ..............2 Marks.

 

d)         The procedure for conducting ID Parades may be described broadly as follows:

i.       The identifying witness must have given a description of the suspect to the police or person in authority at the time of reporting the crime.

ii.      The officer conducting the parade, who must not be the investigating officer, to inform the suspect of the reason for the parade and to inform him/her of his/her right to have a lawyer or friend present during the parade.

                         iii.       The identifying witness not to see the suspect prior to proceeding to the parade.

iv.       The suspect to be placed amongst at least 8 other persons as far as possible of similar age, height, general appearance and class of life as himself/herself.

v.        When explaining the procedure to a witness, the officer conducting the parade should tell him/her that he/she will see a group of people which may or may not contain the person responsible.  The witness should not be told “to pick somebody” or be influenced in any way whatsoever.

vi.      Should the suspect be suffering from disfigurement, steps should be taken to ensure that it is not especially apparent.

vii.      The suspect should be allowed to take any position he/she chooses and be allowed to change position after each identifying witness has left, if he/she so desires.

                         viii.     Care must be taken to ensure witnesses do not communicate with each other.

                          ix.      Every unauthorised person must be excluded from the parade.

  x.       If the witness desires to see the suspect walk, hear him/her speak, see him/her with his/her hat on or off, this should be done but in such event the whole parade should be asked to do the same.

xi.      The officer commanding the parade should ensure that the witness actually

touches the person he/she identifies.

xii.      At the termination of the parade, or during the parade, the officer conducting the parade should ask the suspect if he/she is satisfied that the parade has been conducted, or is being conducted, in a fair manner and note the suspect’s reply in the ID Parade Form (156).

xiii.      A careful note must be made, after each witness leaves the parade, to record whether he/she identified the suspect and in what circumstances.

xiv.     A record should be made by the officer conducting the parade of any comment made by the suspect during the parade, particularly comments when the suspect

is identified.

xv.     The parade must be conducted with scrupulous fairness, otherwise the value of identification as evidence will be lessened or nullified.

..................10 Marks (any 10 of the above answers to earn the candidate the 10

available marks).

Q.6

a)         Offences committed

i.       Kalulu Juha, Shetani Mwanga and Simba Mkali committed against Jirani Mwema the major offence of robbery with violence [contrary to S.296(2) of the Penal Code].

...........2 Marks.

ii.       Kalulu Juha, Shetani Mwanga and Simba Mkali committed against Rama Faraja the offence of malicious damage to property [contrary to S.339(1) of the Penal Code].

          ..............2 Marks.

 

b)         Charges

Count One

            Statement of Offence

            Robbery with violence, contrary to Section 296(2) of the Penal Code, Cap.63.

            Particulars of Offence

            1. Kalulu Juha 2. Shetani Mwanga 3. Simba Mkali: On the 4th April, 2013 at the residence of Mr & Mrs Jirani Mwema in the neighbourhood of the Kenya School of Law within Nairobi City County in the Republic of Kenya, being armed with dangerous or offensive weapons, namely, a pistol, a panga and a crowbar jointly robbed Jirani Mwema of his cash Kshs.70,000/=, Nokia Mobile Phone valued at Kshs.20,000/= and Transistor Radio valued at Kshs.10,000/= and at or immediately before or immediately after the time of the robbery used personal violence to the said Jirani Mwema.

            ..............5½ Marks.

 

Count Two

            Statement of Offence

            Malicious damage to property, contrary  to Section 339(1) of the Penal Code, Cap.63.

            Particulars of Offence

            1. Kalulu Juha 2. Shetani Mwanga 3. Simba Mkali: On the 4th April, 2013 at Rama Faraja’s gate in the neighbourhood of the Kenya School of Law within Nairobi City County in the Republic of Kenya, wilfully and unlawfully smashed and destroyed Rama Faraja’s gate lights valued at Kshs.5,000/=.

            .................. 5½ Marks.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

           

 


 [S1]1 mark

 [S2]1 mark

 [S3]I mark

 [S4]1 mark

 [S5]1 mark for signed and dated pleadings

 [S6]1 mark

 [S7]1 mark

 [S8]I mark

 [S9]2 marks

 [S10]1 mark

 [S11]1 mark

 

 [S12]1 mark

 [S13]I mark

 [S14]1 mark

 [S15]1 mark

 [S16]1 mark

 [S17]1 mark

 [S18]1 mark

 [S19]1 mark

 [S20]1 mark

 [S21]1 mark

 [S22]2 marks for any o2 f these grounds

 [S23]1 mark for signed and dated pleadings

 [MSOffice24]Maximum of 2 marks

 [MSOffice25]1 mark for each point up to a maximum of 3

 [MSOffice26]For each point, 1 mark up to a maximum of 7 marks.

Tuesday, March 29, 2022

WHO CAN PLACE A CAUTION OR CAVEAT?/HOW TO PLACE A CAUTION/WITHDRAWAL AND REMOVAL OF CAUTION

WHO CAN PLACE A CAUTION OR CAVEAT

Any person who is claiming a contractual or other right over land amounting to a defined interest capable of creation by a registrable instrument, for example a lease, may lodge a caution with the Registrar against any dealing which is inconsistent with his or her interest. Entry of a transaction, with respect to such land, may not then be made unless the cautioner has received notice that the same has to be done. Lodging of a caveat or caution without reasonable cause can lead to a remedy in damages.

HOW TO PLACE A CAUTION

A caution is registered by a person who has an interest on a certain parcel of land to prevent any other person from dealing with the land in a way that prejudices the said interest. The effect of a caution is to forbid, to a certain extent, the registration of dealings and the making of entries in the register relating to the land without the cautioner’s consent or until the caution has been withdrawn by;

 The cautioner or;

Removed by order of the Court or;

The Registrar.

The registrar then gives notice in writing of a caution to the proprietor whose land, lease or charge is affected. So long as the caution remains registered, no disposition which is inconsistent with it shall be registered, except with the consent of the cautioner or by order of the court.

Section 71(1) of the Land Registration Act outlines the qualifications of a lodger. However, this is not an absolute right and the Registrar pursuant to Section 71 (4) of the Land Registration Act may reject a caution that is unnecessary or whose purpose can be effected by the registration of an instrument.

REGISTRATION PROCESS OF A CAUTION/CAVEAT

One requires the following documents:

The prescribed form (Form R.L. 22)

An affidavit explaining the interest the cautioner has in the land

A copy of the title (or the title number)

The prescribed fees

It is important to note that no notice is required to be given to the proprietor of the land before one lodges a caution. The documents are filed with the Registrar of Lands who then gives notice, in writing, of the caution to the proprietor whose land, lease or charge is affected by the caution.

WITHDRAWAL AND REMOVAL OF CAUTION

A caution can be removed by the person lodging the same, or by order of the court, or subject to Section 73 (2) of the LRA, by order of the Registrar, if such person fails to remove it after being served with a notice to do so by the Registrar.

According to Subsection 2 the registrar may, on the application of another person interested, serve notice on the cautioner warning him that his caution will be removed at the expiration of the time stated in the notice. If at the expiration of the time stated the cautioner has not objected, the registrar may remove the caution.

However, if the cautioner objects to the removal of the caution, they shall notify the Registrar, in writing, of the objection within the time specified in the notice, and the Registrar shall, after giving the parties an opportunity of being heard, make such order as the Registrar considers fit, and may in the order provide for the payment of costs.

EFFECTS OF LODGING A CAUTION OR CAVEAT WITHOUT CAUSE

Any person who lodges or maintains a caution wrongfully and without reasonable cause shall be liable, in an action for damages at the suit of any person who has sustained damage and to pay compensation to such person

This is because placing a wrongful caution that may lead a registered owner losing prospective clients would attract high damages and compensation. Cautions or caveats are temporary restraints that are lodged with the Registrar of Lands by people forbidding the transactions. Cautioners must prove that they are entitled to interests in the disputed property whose transfer they seek to forbid.

Section 75 of the LRA states that ‘Any person who lodges or maintains a caution wrongfully and without reasonable cause shall be liable, in an action for damages at the suit of any person who has sustained damage, to pay compensation to such person.’